Writing sample of essay on a given topic should agricultural subsidies be stopped food is essential for the survival of any animal on the planet, including human beings this is why farming is as important as the food itself.
No, agricultural subsidies should not be stopped because more than 2/3rd of the population depends on it farmers are struggling with the problems like low income, less crop per hectare, the low selling price of their corp etc if we stop the subsidies the situation will get more worse. Agriculture subsidy should be ended all subsidies should be ended a subsidy is the money government gives to a business or group of businesses (industry) so the price of a product or service remains lower than it otherwise would be without the money.
Of late, however, there has been much debate as to whether or not agricultural subsidies should be stopped the agricultural subsidies have great importance to farmers and agribusinesses since they help provide some form of insurance and assurance for the farmers. The notion, then, that these subsidies help small family farms and protect a vital, but vulnerable industry is an outdated myth risk is inherent for any business: should big agriculture really be. - agricultural subsidies should be stopped as they are not reaching to the poor farmers - there is no use of these subsidies as they make rich farmers more rich and the poor ones poorer - there should be other substitutes for subsidies.
Should agricultural subsidies be stopped subsidies to agriculture needs to decreased slowly but surely people would argue that 70% indians depend on agriculture but they would not think that why do so many people are still in agriculture. Agricultural subsidies be stopped should agricultural subsidies stopped or not has been topic of talk shows without proper representatives from farming side ,according to my opinion agriculture subsidy should not be stopped as our agriculture contribute 15% to our gdp and 60% of total employment beside it we know that our economy is agriculture dependent and beside it 95% of farmer comes under small land holding farmer who are not able to do cultivation without subsidies.
Agriculture subsidies should be removed or not i think instead of stopping agriculture subsidy we should focus on agriculture policy which restrict the produce within the state some state not allow to sell or buying the produce in other state which increase the cost and inflation also along with this. - agricultural subsidies should be stopped as they are not reaching to the poor farmers - there is no use of these subsidies as they make rich farmers more rich and the poor ones poorer - there should be other substitutes for subsidies - even after providing the subsidies the farmers are abondoning their land and moving to cities. Should agricultural subsidies be stopped the impact of agricultural subsidies the impact of agricultural subsidies many countries started to negotiate doha development agenda under the world trade organization (wto) in 2001 in july 2004, members in wto reached agreement to make a reform in agriculture.
Agriculture subsidy should be ended all subsidies should be ended a subsidy is the money government gives to a business or group of businesses (industry) so the price of a product or service remains lower than it otherwise would be without the money usually the excuse is made for a subsidy because a product or service is believed to be more valueable to consumers than the free market is willing to pay for it (if this sounds a bit iffy on the surface to you, you are in good company. One of the most hotly contested aspects of us trade policy is the program of subsidies the united states provides its farmers trade partners object to us farm subsidies, saying they unfairly block out foreign competition — this has been one of the primary sticking points in the stalled doha round of trade negotiations. What a difference 12 years makes in that time, developing countries have grown their own agricultural subsidies rapidly and those in briic countries (brazil, russia, india, indonesia and china) have increased the fastest china's agricultural subsidies, estimated at $160bn (£103bn) in 2012, now dwarf those in the us ($19bn) and eu ($67bn) combined. Agricultural subsidies should not be stopped but it should be done in an efficient manner so that the needed farmers or poor farmers who are not financially stable can get these facilities and their situation can be improved government should have all the details of farmers and on the basis of that list distribution should be done.
Agriculture subsidies should not stop because in our country like india we have more than 6 lakhs villages their main occupation is agriculture about 15% is contributed by the agriculture sector lot of farmers are suiciding because of the inability to repay the loan if the subsidy is cut how can. In my opinion, agricultural subsidies should not be stopped the subsidies are a supporting pillar to the lacks of farmers in the country farming in our country is primarily not as advanced and mechanised as in other developed countries.
Agricultural subsidies should not be stopped, because many farmers can’t handle the burden of total investment it’ll be nice if government provide these subsidies to the farmers, who deserve it, not to the rich.